Ningbo Bohua Mechanical Parts Co., Ltd. · Linda, Export Sales · linda@ningbobohua.com · www.bohua-casting.com
Engineering resource
Valve Body RFQ Guide: Features, Interfaces, and Inspection
A valve body RFQ needs a controlled feature map and a defined acceptance state. Identify passages, ports, functional bores, sealing interfaces, remaining walls, and permanent closures. Then assign the machining, cleaning, inspection, and testing responsibilities. This guide explains the questions to resolve before comparing suppliers for a cast-and-machined aluminum body.
On this page
- What Makes a Valve Body RFQ Complete?
- Which Passages and Walls Need Individual Control?
- What Must Be Specified for Ports and Threads?
- How Should Spool Bores and Cartridge Cavities Be Defined?
- How Are Cross-Drilled Access Holes Closed?
- What Defines an ISO 4401 Mounting Face?
- How Do Installed Length and Flange Geometry Differ?
- Which Wall Thickness Must Remain After Machining?
- What Controls Seat Pocket and Stem Alignment?
- How Should Coating Masks and Cleanliness Be Specified?
- Which Checks Demonstrate the Required Condition?
- What Common Problems Should the Review Investigate?
- When Is the Package Ready to Send?
What Makes a Valve Body RFQ Complete?
A complete RFQ defines the finished body, its mating interfaces, and the evidence required for acceptance. Start with the controlled drawing and flow model. Then assign responsibility for machining, closures, cleaning, and testing. A similar product photograph helps identify the component family, but it cannot establish a pressure rating or an internal passage design.
| Decision | Buyer input | Required distinction |
|---|---|---|
| Geometry authority | Aligned drawing and model revisions, assembly references, and a conflict rule | Identify which document governs when files disagree. |
| Delivered state | As-cast, heat-treated, rough-machined, or finish-machined and cleaned body | List operations that remain with the buyer. |
| Material and service | Alloy, temper, fluid, and design conditions released by the designer | A material name alone does not define service suitability. |
| Approval | Acceptance limits, sampling, records, and deviation authority | Supplier proposals need approval before they become production requirements. |
Use the aluminum valve body manufacturing page to review supplier scope. Use this guide to resolve the feature-level questions before sending the package.
At Bohua
Gravity casting and tilt-pour are the principal processes. A356 and ZL114 are the confirmed alloys for this work. T5 and T6 heat treatment are performed in-house. These are the confirmed capabilities for drawing review; the released project specification still defines the required condition.

Which Passages and Walls Need Individual Control?
Map each passage zone to its function and final manufacturing state. The same outer shape can contain different flow paths, wall boundaries, and machining access. The valve designer controls the hydraulic geometry, flow direction, trim selection, and complete-valve flow coefficient, Cv.
- Identify inlet, outlet, branches, turns, seat regions, and isolated cavities on one approved flow model.
- Separate core-formed surfaces, surfaces left as cast, drilled passages, blended transitions, and final machined surfaces.
- For each zone, state its local datum, surface requirement, allowed transition, machining stock, inspection access, and acceptance stage.
- Review core location, thick-to-thin transitions, feeding, tool access, and datum transfer against the final passage model.
A dimensional report, X-ray image, or body tightness result does not establish complete-valve Cv. Keep hydraulic design changes under the designer's approval. A manufacturing proposal that changes a passage transition should identify the affected zone and its approval owner.
Review gravity casting and permanent mold capability and the casting process selection guide when the route remains open.

What Must Be Specified for Ports and Threads?
Define each port by function, sealing method, and inspection requirement. A thread designation does not describe the entire sealing interface. Separate pressure-sealing features from fastener threads and temporary test connections.
| Feature | Specify in the RFQ | Acceptance evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Thread | Controlling drawing or standard edition, thread form, class, depth, and entry chamfer | Applicable gauge method, acceptance rule, and record frequency |
| Seal interface | Sealing land, gasket face, or O-ring groove and its final condition | Dimensions, flatness, and surface texture at the specified locations |
| Port location | Axis and position relative to assembly datums and neighboring bores | Drawing-linked dimensional report |
| Internal intersection | Edge condition, accessible cleaning route, and protection after machining | Approved burr and cleanliness verification |
Use the same port identifiers on the drawing, hydraulic schematic, gauge record, and test setup. Mark unused connections explicitly. Thread acceptance and body pressure-tightness are separate checks; define both when the project requires them.
How Should Spool Bores and Cartridge Cavities Be Defined?
Define bore function before choosing its machining and measurement requirements. Spool, sleeve, locating, and auxiliary bores can require different geometry and surface controls. A surface roughness result alone does not establish roundness, straightness, or fit.
| Interface | Design input | Process and inspection question |
|---|---|---|
| Spool bore | Diameter, geometry, datum relationship, texture direction, and final surface requirement | Is boring or reaming sufficient, or is a separately agreed finishing operation required? |
| Screw-in cartridge | Selected cartridge supplier and model, controlled cavity reference, thread, steps, shoulders, and seal regions | Which dimensions and gauge results establish the finished cavity? |
| Slip-in cartridge | Selected cavity, cover or retention interface, seal regions, and applicable drawing or standard edition | Who supplies the cover, cartridge, seals, and assembled-test evidence? |
ISO 7368:2025 addresses geometry for two-port slip-in cartridge cavities. It does not specify rated pressures. Apply it only when the designer selects that interface. Screw-in and slip-in cavities must not share an assumed geometry or compatibility claim.
Source: ISO 7368:2025, official scope.
- Cross-reference cavity ports to the circuit and the selected cartridge's port convention.
- Define the final acceptance state after heat treatment, machining, and any permitted finish.
- If honing or another finishing operation is required, agree the process owner, tooling, wear controls, and measurement plan during review.
- Specify where bore size, geometry, and surface texture are measured; select methods suitable for access and the controlled tolerance.
Request special finishing and gaging as project requirements. The casting and CNC machining page describes the confirmed manufacturing scope.
How Are Cross-Drilled Access Holes Closed?
Treat a permanent closure and its prepared seat as one controlled interface. An instruction to plug a hole after machining leaves hardware, installation, cleaning, and acceptance responsibilities unresolved.
| Opening class | Purpose | Control to release |
|---|---|---|
| Functional port | Connects the finished body to another component or line | Mating interface and sealing requirement |
| Service cavity | Remains accessible for assembly or maintenance | Access, removable hardware, and delivered protection |
| Temporary test connection | Supports an agreed test setup | Fixture seal and condition after fixture removal |
| Permanent manufacturing access hole | Provides machining access that is closed in the delivered body | Closure reference, seat geometry, installation, retention, and tightness evidence |
For every permanent closure, specify the installation side, local wall, material compatibility, prepared bore or thread, surface condition, and required tooling. Assign hardware supply, identity checks, installation, and final inspection. Changes to the closure system need the designated approval owner's authorization.
- Machine and deburr the intersecting passages.
- Prepare the seat and verify the accessible internal edges.
- Clean, dry, and inspect the passage before access is lost.
- Install the approved closure and record the required retention and tightness evidence.
If cleaning follows installation, confirm that the closed geometry still allows the specified cleaning and verification. Record the sequence in the agreed manufacturing plan.
What Defines an ISO 4401 Mounting Face?
Release the exact interface code and port map, together with the project drawing. ISO 4401:2005 covers mounting surfaces for four-port hydraulic directional control valves. A trade label such as CETOP or NG alone does not identify the complete interface.
- State whether the supplied component is a valve body, subplate, or manifold pad.
- Map pressure, tank, and work ports, plus any optional pilot or drain connection.
- Locate fixing holes and orientation features, including locating-pin holes where specified.
- Define mounting-pad boundaries, datum relationships, flatness, surface texture, thread depths, and the final acceptance state.
- Assign seal recesses, sealing rings, fasteners, and assembly testing to named project roles.
Resolve conflicts between the selected interface, mating-component data, drawing, and model before machining. Keep the mounting face clean and protected after acceptance. A dimensionally correct pad still needs the correct passage connections and assembly conditions.
Source: ISO 4401:2005, official scope. Project dimensions and acceptance limits must come from the released interface documents.
How Do Installed Length and Flange Geometry Differ?
Control installation length separately from each end connection. Nominal size or pressure class alone does not establish either requirement. The designer must select the applicable drawing or standard edition for the actual body arrangement and material.
| Control | Information to release |
|---|---|
| Installed length | Face-to-face, end-to-end, or center-to-end definition; measurement endpoints; tolerance; free or installed state; gasket and coating assumptions |
| Each end connection | Axis, orientation, facing, bore transition, bolt pattern, hole geometry, local wall, surface requirement, and shipping protection |
| Mating assembly | Ownership of mating connections, seals, bolting, alignment, and assembled tests |
Give inlet and outlet separate entries if their axes, facing, or machining state differ. For a body clamped between mating flanges, the designer must define the gasket, alignment, and installed-length assumptions. Use interface requirements appropriate to the selected construction.
Which Wall Thickness Must Remain After Machining?
Specify the required remaining metal wall in the final accepted state. Keep the design minimum, service allowance, casting stock, and machining allowance as separate fields. Extra metal removed during machining cannot serve as an allowance for later service.
| Quantity | Purpose and owner |
|---|---|
| Final required minimum | The designer releases the acceptance threshold for each zone and measurement direction. |
| Corrosion or erosion allowance | The designer defines any service allowance and how it relates to the required minimum. |
| Casting stock | The manufacturing review addresses filling, feeding, distortion, and cleanup needs. |
| Machining allowance | The machining plan reserves material for producing final bores, faces, pockets, and datums. |
Map pressure walls near ports, threads, seat pockets, closures, and passage transitions. Identify adjacent holes and the final machined surfaces used for measurement. Assess core displacement and machining breakout against this map. State the verification method and access before tooling approval.
Do not count a coating, insert, or mating component toward a metal-wall requirement unless the released design permits it. Keep units and calculation rules consistent. Process capability and a nominal casting wall do not establish a service pressure rating.
What Controls Seat Pocket and Stem Alignment?
Follow the approved assembly's datum chain from the body-side seat pocket to the guiding and bonnet features. The actual seat, cage, retainer, or guide arrangement determines which relationships matter.
- Define the seat pocket profile, axial position, shoulder, retention feature, seal land, and local wall.
- Identify the controlling guide axis, bonnet pilot, joint face, fastener pattern, and any separate guide components.
- State the drawing-controlled position, runout, perpendicularity, or other alignment requirement and its inspection datum.
- Separate body dimensional evidence from seat design, trim fit, and assembled shutoff testing.
The valve designer owns the trim architecture and final functional acceptance. Specify which body features are inspected after final machining and cleaning. Do not infer a seat fit or leakage class from a photograph.
How Should Coating Masks and Cleanliness Be Specified?
Mark every protected interface and identify whether dimensions are accepted before or after finishing. Coating on a controlled bore, thread, seal land, or datum can change fit or inspection access.
- Provide a mask map for functional bores, threads, mounting faces, seal lands, and reference surfaces.
- Define permitted finish boundaries, edge conditions, and verification after mask removal.
- Specify internal burr acceptance and the cleanliness verification method, including sampling and record requirements.
- Define washing, drying, preservation, passage protection, and packaging needed to retain the accepted state.
Use the surface finishing guide for broader finish selection. Keep the valve drawing responsible for the exact mask boundaries and final interface requirements.
Which Checks Demonstrate the Required Condition?
Match each acceptance requirement to a method, manufacturing stage, sampling plan, and record. Different checks answer different questions. Define the applicable combination from the drawing and failure risk.
| Check | Record to define | Boundary |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | Feature identifiers, datum frame, method, result, and acceptance reference | Does not establish internal cleanliness or pressure-tightness. |
| Surface texture | Measurement location, direction, final state, and specified parameter | Does not replace bore geometry checks. |
| Internal inspection | Selected zones, method, views, frequency, and acceptance reference | Does not by itself establish complete-valve performance. |
| Body pressure-tightness | Tested cavity, isolated ports, closures, medium, pressure, duration, acceptance, stage, and records | Separate from operating pressure approval, flow, actuation, and assembled shutoff tests. |
At Bohua
Inspection equipment includes CMM systems, X-ray systems, and a surface roughness tester. Pressure-tightness testing uses air-under-water immersion at 3 bar or more. Impregnation is performed by a qualified subcontractor only with customer approval. PPAP support is available up to Level 5.
Project documents must define the pressure-tightness acceptance rule and test stage. Machining may expose a leak path that was not present at the casting surface. Define whether casting screening, final component testing, or both are required. A fixture seal must be distinguished from a permanent delivered closure.
Review quality-control equipment and records and pressure-tight casting and test scope when assigning these checks.

What Common Problems Should the Review Investigate?
Use the observed symptom to select checks before changing the process. The possibilities below guide investigation; they do not diagnose a specific returned body.
| Symptom | Possible contributors | Review first |
|---|---|---|
| Spool sticking | Bore geometry, surface condition, intersecting burrs, or contamination | Final bore measurements, edge verification, and cleaning evidence |
| Leakage after machining | Exposed casting discontinuities, damaged sealing surfaces, or closure issues | Leak location, machined state, fixture seals, and closure records |
| Incorrect passage connection | Conflicting port conventions or model revisions | Schematic-to-drawing port map and revision authority |
| Insufficient remaining wall | Core displacement, datum transfer, or excessive material removal | Zone map, final surface locations, and stock assumptions |
| Assembly mismatch | Wrong interface code, end orientation, seat reference, or coating boundary | Released mating data and final interface inspection |
Record the finding, affected feature, corrective proposal, and approval owner. Avoid changing a passage, closure, or functional interface without reviewing its effect on the assembled valve.
When Is the Package Ready to Send?
Send the RFQ when suppliers can identify the same finished body and acceptance scope. Keep unresolved design decisions visible, with an owner and an explicit quotation assumption.
- Release aligned geometry, feature maps, material condition, and applicable document editions.
- Assign casting, machining, special finishing, closure installation, and test responsibilities.
- List inspection records, first-article and production sampling, traceability, and change approval requirements.
- Add annual volume, release pattern, sample needs, tooling status, destination, and packaging requirements.
Use the casting drawing requirements to resolve file-control gaps. Then send the valve body drawing package for quotation. The buyer resources library provides the supporting procurement guides.
Send your valve body drawing package
Include the feature maps, final supplied condition, acceptance records, and annual volume. Not sure which process fits? Tell us what the part must do. In a free drawing review, our engineers recommend a process and suggest design changes where needed.
Send your drawing →