← Blog·RFQ GuideJune 10, 2026·9 min read

Heat Treatment Distortion and Machining Datums for Aluminum Castings: RFQ Checklist for T6 Movement, Fixtures, CMM, and Approval

Buyer checklist for A356-T6 casting distortion, machining datums, fixture strategy, CMM stage, heat-treatment records, and quote-ready approval evidence.

By LindaTechnical reviewer: Junchi Li

RFQ CTA

Have a casting project? Upload your drawing for a fast, structured quote review.

Send the drawing, target alloy, finishing scope, MOQ, and delivery timing. Bohua will review it like a real sourcing project, not a generic contact request.

Buyer note: confirm assumptions before quoting

Lead time, MOQ, yield, leak-test scope, machining scope, and landed cost depend on the drawing, alloy, inspection plan, annual volume, and destination market. For current supplier facts, review the supplier capability sheet or send an RFQ package.

# Heat Treatment Distortion and Machining Datums for Aluminum Castings: RFQ Checklist for T6 Movement, Fixtures, CMM, and Approval

Heat treatment can make an aluminum casting stronger, but it can also move the part enough to change machining allowance, bearing-seat alignment, gasket-face flatness, bore position, and CMM results. This is especially important for A356, A356-T6, ZL114-equivalent, pump housings, valve bodies, gearbox housings, reducer housings, and EV motor housings with precision-machined interfaces.

This checklist helps buyers turn "T6 required" into a quote-ready RFQ instead of a vague material note.

Useful Bohua routes:

1) State why heat treatment is required

Do not write "T6" only because it appeared on an old drawing. Explain the engineering reason:

  • strength or hardness target
  • pressure or leak-risk requirement
  • fatigue, vibration, or structural concern
  • bearing-seat stability after machining
  • customer material standard
  • legacy part approval requirement

If the buyer is open to alternatives, say so. If A356-T6 is fixed by drawing or customer specification, say that too. A supplier cannot quote the right route unless the RFQ separates required properties from preferred assumptions.

2) Define the inspection state for dimensions

Distortion discussions become confused when buyers and suppliers inspect different states. A casting can be checked:

  • as cast
  • after heat treatment
  • after straightening, if allowed
  • after rough machining
  • after finish machining
  • after coating, impregnation, or final cleaning

For quote comparison, state which dimensions must be proven at each state. A raw casting CMM report does not prove a final bearing bore. A final machining CMM report may not show how much heat treatment moved the casting before machining.

3) Protect datum strategy before tooling and fixtures are quoted

Machining datums should not be an afterthought. Heat treatment movement can change how the part sits in a fixture, how much stock remains, and whether critical faces clean up.

Mark these features in the RFQ:

  • primary, secondary, and tertiary datums
  • bearing seats, seal bores, gasket faces, and O-ring grooves
  • machined mounting faces and bolt patterns
  • areas with thin walls, ribs, or large flat surfaces
  • surfaces that must clean up after heat treatment
  • any datum shift concern from an existing supplier or previous sample

If the current drawing has unclear datums, attach a marked-up PDF and ask the supplier to confirm the machining datum plan before final quotation.

4) Quote machining allowance and fixture plan together

RFQ CTA

Have a casting project? Upload your drawing for a fast, structured quote review.

Send the drawing, target alloy, finishing scope, MOQ, and delivery timing. Bohua will review it like a real sourcing project, not a generic contact request.

Heat-treatment distortion is not only a heat-treatment issue. It affects casting tooling, machining stock, roughing sequence, clamping, and inspection. Ask suppliers to state:

  • proposed machining allowance on critical faces and bores
  • whether rough machining before heat treatment is needed or not allowed
  • whether the fixture references cast surfaces or pre-machined datums
  • whether straightening is allowed by the buyer
  • whether a trial sample should be measured before finalizing fixtures
  • whether CMM programming is included in the quote

Do not compare unit prices if one supplier included fixture validation and another quoted only finish machining.

5) Ask for records that match the risk

The record package should fit the part. For a simple bracket, heat-treatment records may be enough. For a gearbox housing or EV motor housing, the buyer may need a stronger inspection package.

Consider asking for:

  • heat-treatment batch record
  • hardness or mechanical-property record if drawing-defined
  • pre-machining dimensional check for distortion-sensitive castings
  • final CMM report tied to the drawing datums
  • flatness, runout, concentricity, or bore gauge record
  • FAI or PPAP-style approval record when required
  • material certificate linked to the heat-treatment lot

Avoid generic promises such as "distortion controlled." Ask what the supplier will measure, at which stage, and how the record will be delivered.

6) Use application risk to choose the right RFQ path

Different castings need different emphasis:

Part familyMain distortion / datum risk
Gearbox or reducer housingbearing-seat alignment, shaft center distance, gasket-face flatness
EV motor housing or end bellbearing bore concentricity, seal face, mounting datum stack
Pump housingseal bore, bearing seat, gasket face, leak-test after machining
Valve bodyport position, sealing face, thread alignment, burr and cleanliness risk
Structural brackethole pattern, mounting flatness, load path, PPAP or FAI evidence

Use the specific product-family quote route when the buyer has a part-family risk, and use the quality-documentation route when the blocker is the record package.

Copy-paste RFQ starter

> Heat treatment distortion and machining datum RFQ (copy-paste)

> Files: 2D PDF rev __ ; STEP rev __

> Alloy and temper: A356 / A356-T6 / ZL114 / buyer-defined __

> Reason for heat treatment: strength / hardness / pressure / customer spec / legacy approval __

> Inspection state required: as-cast __ ; post-heat-treatment __ ; rough-machined __ ; final-machined __

> Critical datums: primary __ ; secondary __ ; tertiary __

> Critical features: bearing seats __ ; seal bores __ ; gasket faces __ ; bolt patterns __ ; O-ring grooves __

> Machining allowance concern: faces __ ; bores __ ; thin walls __

> Records requested: heat-treatment record __ ; hardness/mechanical record __ ; CMM __ ; flatness/runout/bore gauge __ ; FAI/PPAP if required __

> Annual volume and destination: __ ; Incoterm __

Submit the heat-treatment and datum scope before price comparison

Use this route when T6 movement, fixture strategy, machining stock, or final CMM approval could change the supplier's quote. Send the drawing, STEP file, datum plan, heat-treatment requirement, inspection state, and approval records before comparing price.

Buyer questions before RFQ

What should buyers send for an A356-T6 heat-treatment distortion and datum RFQ?

Send 2D and STEP files, alloy and temper requirement, why heat treatment is required, inspection state, primary and secondary datums, bearing seats, seal bores, gasket faces, machining allowance concerns, fixture strategy questions, heat-treatment record needs, CMM stage, annual volume, destination, and Incoterm.

Why should post-heat-treatment and final-machining inspection states be separated?

Heat treatment can move the raw casting before machining, while final machining determines the approved functional surfaces. Separating the states helps buyers compare machining allowance, fixture assumptions, final CMM scope, and whether the supplier included enough validation in the quote.

Which Bohua route fits heat treatment and datum risk?

Use the A356 material route for alloy and temper questions, gearbox or EV motor housing routes for bearing-seat and datum-stack risks, and the quality-documentation route when the buyer needs heat-treatment records, final CMM, FAI, or PPAP-style approval evidence.

Project CTA

Need Quality Documentation With Your RFQ?

Send your drawing for a structured DFM review, quote scope, and project-specific timing discussion.

This article was produced with assistance from AI language models and reviewed by our engineering team. Technical specifications (alloys, tolerances, process parameters) should always be verified against your project drawings, buyer-approved quality requirements, and applicable ASTM / ISO specifications before production release. If you notice any factual issue, please use the article contact path.

Need Expert Advice on Your Casting Project?

Our engineering team can recommend the right alloy, process, and design optimizations for your specific requirements.

Send RFQ to Engineering